W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: setAttributeNS(): should it change the namespace prefix?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:31:01 +0100
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v5qd9zhg64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:24:07 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> This is somewhat off-topic, but I'm actually hoping that we can get rid  
> of namespaced attributes. They create a lot of silly performance issues  
> (even if you never ever use namespaced attributes or
> setAttributeNS/getAttributeNS) and implementation complexity. Not to
> mention that people very often misunderstand how they work and think that
> prefix-less attributes belong to the same namespace as the owner element  
> or use the default (prefixless-xmlns declared) namespace.
>
> There's a very good chance that this doesn't work, but it seems worth
> trying. It would be a very nice simplification in Gecko, and would
> measurably improve the speed of setAttribute.

If you store Attr.name it should not be that bad I think. I do agree that  
if we can simplify attributes as a concept even more that would be great.  
The DOM spec already puts emphasis on Attr.name/Attr.value.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 23:31:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:08 GMT