W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: [ElementTraversal] Moving traversal from Element Traversal to DOM4?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:53:55 -0800
To: www-dom <www-dom@w3.org>, "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v4oxb5s464w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:40:47 -0800, Charles McCathieNevile  
<chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:54:31 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>  
> wrote:
>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 15:19 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> Doug, All - as a followup to the short conversation on October 31 re  
>>> moving the traversal part of Element Traversal to DOM4, do you have  
>>> any thoughts on what, if anything, should be done?
>>
>> Is there any reason that more than pasting it into DOM4 plus whatever  
>> stylistic arrangements the editor likes would be needed?
>
> None that I can see, and no reason not to do that that I can think of.

FWIW, this has been done long ago. I think the question was more what we  
want to do with the Element Traversal document itself.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 17:54:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:08 GMT