W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > July to September 2011

Fwd: Rescinding the DOM 2 View Recommendation?

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:33:41 -0400
Message-ID: <4E42C0F5.7040808@nokia.com>
To: www-dom <www-dom@w3.org>
Comments from this list's members re the proposal below are also welcome.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Rescinding the DOM 2 View Recommendation?
Resent-Date: 	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:18:51 +0000
Resent-From: 	<public-webapps@w3.org>
Date: 	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:17:53 -0400
From: 	ext Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
To: 	public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren 
<annevk@opera.com>, ext Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>



Anne, Ms2ger, All,

Anne and others proposed in [Proposal] the DOM 2 View Recommendation
[D2V] be "rescinded". The rescinding process is defined in the Process
Document [Rescind]. However,  Ian Jacobs just indicated in IRC
[#webapps] it has never actually been used.

One process requirement for rescinding a Recommendation is a "separate
rationale for the proposal to rescind". Would you Anne and/or someone
please create the rationale document (using WebApps' wiki)? I think it
should include a clear problem statement i.e. identify the interop
issues this Recommendation is causing as well as the alternative (new)
solution.

If anyone has comments about this proposal, please speak up.

-ArtB

[Proposal]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0454.html
[D2V] http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Views/
[#webapps] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20110810
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 17:34:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:08 GMT