- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:42:15 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Charles Pritchard wrote: > > On the topic of semantics, Shadow DOM is getting a little crowded; the > canvas shadow dom is a part of the dom unique in that its children are > essentially display: none, but can still receive focus. That's not a "shadow DOM". It's just the regular DOM. > The "Shadow DOM" title can also apply to native form widgets, and has > been exposed for WebKit authors to toy with; with great similarity to > XBL2 intentions. This is the only meaning of "shadow DOM". > And as I head into possible SVG a11y semantics, foreignObject may act as > another shadow. This is also not a "shadow DOM". It's just the regular DOM. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 19:42:38 UTC