On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:45:41 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> >> I agree that it seems very strange to allow uninitialized events to be >> dispatched. > > What distinguishes an uninitialized event from an initialized event in your > opinion? One where the author has explicitly chosen a name for the event. > A hidden "initEvent() invoked" flag? Or the WebKit model where > Event.type must be non-empty before it can be dispatched? (I.e. it would be > helpful if you replied to the email from Glenn Maynard.) *shrug* that is less important to me. Events with an empty name seems generally useless so that's fine to use as a flag. An internal flag would also work. / JonasReceived on Sunday, 13 March 2011 17:19:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:07 GMT