On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:57:34 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> >> I think we should just have this (and as much from DOM L3 Events as >> needed for back compat of course). > > Fair enough I guess. In Web IDL terms, does each event interface need to be > annotated with [Constructor(...)] for this along with an appropriate > definition, or is there some way we can only do it for Event and all others > will get it automatically? You'll likely want a different dictionary for each constructor, so I suspect you'll need the annotation for interface. It'll be a bit more work to spec, but it should make it a lot easier for implementors and authors to read. / JonasReceived on Friday, 24 June 2011 10:17:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:07 GMT