W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Fwd: comment on DOM 3 Events LC #2 on WebApps WG's request

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:45:45 -0400
Message-ID: <4DF9FAF9.5070501@w3.org>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
CC: www-dom <www-dom@w3.org>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Jacob Rossi <jrossi@microsoft.com>
Hi, Daniel-

First, let me say that I think it's a good idea to start thinking about 
CSS events.

However, we clearly don't have consensus on that yet, or existing 
implementations, so I believe that DOM 4 (aka DOM Core) is the proper 
place to define them, rather than DOM3 Events; DOM 4 has already been 
started, so I don't think we will have any more delay specifying them 
there than in DOM3 Events.

Alternately, they could be defined in some separate spec... a CSS Events 
spec, perhaps?

I'd like to hear from implementers on their opinions, and from my 
co-editor Jacob Rossi, as well as the rest of the WebApps and CSS 
communities.

Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Staff Contact, SVG, WebApps, Web Events, and Audio WGs

Arthur Barstow wrote (on 6/15/11 1:57 PM):
> Below is a D3E Last Call comment from Daniel Glazman.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: comment on DOM 3 Events LC #2 on WebApps WG's request
> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:30:26 +0200
> From: ext Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
> To: www-style@w3.org <www-style@w3.org>
> CC: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
>
>
>
> (personal comments here, not CSS WG's official view)
>
> I have one comment to make about the document [1]: we have at
> least four pseudo-classes in CSS 3 UI [3] that could have their
> event counterparts...
>
> :invalid
> :valid
> :in-range
> :out-range
>
> Would be really nice to have event-based callbacks for these
> CSS states.
>
> [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ui/#pseudo-validity
>
> </Daniel>
>
>
>

-- 
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 12:45:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:07 GMT