- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 19:10:46 +0200
- To: www-dom@w3.org, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: "Hallvord R. M. Steen" <hallvord@opera.com>
On Mon, 09 May 2011 18:53:39 +0200, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi, Simon-
>
> Simon Pieters wrote (on 5/9/11 12:19 PM):
>> On Fri, 06 May 2011 05:57:50 +0200, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It seems you were the original poster for ISSUE-133, adding keyCode
>>> and charCode:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/133
>>>
>>> I've followed Hallvord's suggestion (see below)... could you please
>>> let us know if this satisfies you, as well?
>>
>> I would be happier if it were normative, but I'm not going to object.
>
> Understood.
>
>
>> I don't see browsers implementing LegacyKeyboardEvent as an interface
>> that extends KeyboardEvent, since this would cause all keyboard events
>> to show up as "legacy" in debuggers and elsewhere. It seems better to
>> specify it as
>>
>> [Supplemental]
>> interface KeyboardEvent {
>> ...
>> }
>
> That's (more or less) how I had it originally, but got feedback asking
> to make it distinct from the KeyboardEvent interface. I've now changed
> it back to being supplemental, per your suggestion, and simply made the
> distinction clear in the prose.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html#KeyboardEvent-supplemental-interface
Thank you.
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 17:11:18 UTC