W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Deprecation of DOMAttrModified (Was: DOMActivate vs. Activation Behavior)

From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:18:27 -0800
Cc: "w3c-wai-pf@w3.org PF" <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>, www-dom@w3.org, public-hypertext-cg@w3.org
Message-Id: <2735402F-87AF-49D4-A5EA-DC1A7D6BD553@apple.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>

On Feb 10, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:

> Ah, I understand your argument now. 

> 
> In any case, I don't think mutation events is the path forward here.
> We at mozilla want to phase them out due to the various problems that
> they have, and my guess is that microsoft won't implement them for the
> same reason. This won't change no matter what the spec says.

Agreed. My request was to retain DOMAttrModified or provide a suitable replacement. I don't have any particular attachment to the current mutation event model, as long as there is a long term goal to provide a standardized method for author notification when a specific attribute changes.

James
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 18:19:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:04 GMT