W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: [FastMutation] Updated Proposal on the DOM L3 Events Wiki

From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:03:30 +0200
Message-ID: <4B608E02.5070508@helsinki.fi>
To: Travis Leithead <travil@microsoft.com>
CC: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Hi Travis,

Few comments about NodeWatch


*  When using selectors that do not imply document structural 
relationships (e.g., “div”) movements of the elements within the 
document will not trigger callbacks. If this scenario is needed, supply 
a selector that enforces a particular document structure (e.g., “div>div”)

How would you handle for example the case where div elements under
another div are re-ordered.



Does minimumFrequency==0 mean same as with setTimeout(foo, 0) or does it
mean "execute as soon as possible after mutation"?
I think the latter one might be desirable in some (many?) cases.


How to handle namespaced elements? namespaced attributes?


In general I like the NodeWatch approach. Should be implementable in JS 
right now (without some optimizations which browser engines can do).
But it needs some tweaking still.




-Olli






On 1/27/10 2:38 AM, Travis Leithead wrote:
> Based on the last round of feedback [1], I've updated the proposal
> for "Selector-based mutation events" (which I keep calling "fast
> mutation events" for some reason...). Doug, I'm sure you're hard at
> work on a better acronym...
>
> In this edition, I expanded the background sections and enumerated
> many of the usage scenarios, relying heavily on previous email
> threads and discussions to summarize points. For completeness I also
> added Jonas' original proposal so that the two could be compared
> side-by-side. The proposals are very different--each has pros and
> cons, and I hope that through constructive discussions we can arrive
> at a unified proposal that will work for most (or all) scenarios.
>
> So, please go read it and let me know what you think:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Selector-based_Mutation_Events_v2_%28needs_a_better_name%29
>
>  Doug, consider this the kick-off for W3C-ifying this proposal.
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2009OctDec/0140.html
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 19:04:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:04 GMT