W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: "keyIdentifier" Sucks

From: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:13:55 +1000
Message-ID: <4AB84F03.6040507@westnet.com.au>
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
CC: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>

Doug Schepers wrote:
>
> Here are some counter-proposals, in roughly descending order of my 
> preference:
> 1) keyname (I'd need to come up with some other term for what I'm 
> calling a "key name" in the spec, but that's fine)
> 2) keystring
> 3) keyvalue
> 4) keyaddress
> 5) keyid (I don't like this one for a number of reasons)
> 6) keypeek (joke)
>
The XBL spec uses "key" for event filtering. Seems okay to me.
Received on Tuesday, 22 September 2009 04:14:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:03 GMT