W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: [D3E] Agenda, telecon 1830Z wed 25 March

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:49:50 -0400
Message-ID: <49C9FE3E.2030102@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
CC: www-dom@w3.org
Hi, Folks-

Sorry, I've been working on the spec, but I've been having a really 
frustrating time, and I've got some more urgent things I need to take 
care of this week.  I don't think it would be worth holding a telcon 
this week, based on my progress thus far.

I'd like to ask that we put off the telcon one more week.  I'll have a 
new revision checked in by this Friday, to give everyone time to review 
it.  I'm hoping we can make more progress with a substantive spec at hand.

Apologies-
-Doug

Charles McCathieNevile wrote (on 3/24/09 4:58 PM):
> There will be a DOM 3 Events call on Wednesday (that's tomorrow where I
> am now...)
>
> Logistics:
> tel +1.617.761.6200 room 3661# ("DOM3").
> Time: Pacific 11.30am, Boston 2.30 pm (summer time).
> 1830Z, 1930 CET, 2030 Helsinki
>
> Agenda:
> 1. Identify scribe, confirm last minutes
>
> 2. Action item review. Due this week (or earlier):
> ACTION-1[1] Find open issues and update the Spec - schepers
> ACTION-6 [2] Add a diagram about wheel axes etc
> ACTION-7 [3] Clarify default actions (section 1.3)
> ACTION 312 [4] Propose langauge to resolve ISSUE-44 - schepers
> ACTION 318 [5] Research what SVG does for load - schepers
> ACTION 319 [6] Publish your findings about mutation event implementation
> - Olli
> ACTION 320 [7] Talk to people at Opera about mutation events - chaals
>
> 3. ISSUE-44 [8] (related to actions 312 and 318 above)
> What should D3E say about the window object and where events are fired.
>
> 4. ISSUE-39 [9] (related to action 320 above)
> Consider changing ordering/firing of mutation events? What should we do
> about mutation events? Is it worth having ARIA-specific events (is that
> a new issue)?
>
> 5. Publication schedule [10]
> Doug hopes to make a new editor's draft available. That would mean that
> there is something to review, and more issues may be raised on it if
> people have had time.
>
> 6. Other overdue action items? [11]
>
> 7. Review of editor's draft
> (This depends on having one, and people having had time to look at it).
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/1
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/6
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/7
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/312
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/318
> [6] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/319
> [7] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/320
> [8] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/44
> [9] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/39
> [10] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/321
> [11] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/2
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 09:50:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:59 GMT