W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Mutation events - slowness examples

From: Sean Hogan <shogun70@westnet.com.au>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:56:36 +1000
Message-ID: <4A447124.5010207@westnet.com.au>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: DOM public list <www-dom@w3.org>
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Sean Hogan wrote:
>> OK can you provide URLs for "all sorts of pages out there that sort 
>> multi-thousand-row tables"?
>
> The other report we had was something that was not easily publicly 
> available (we were given something that looked like a reduced 
> example).  So I can't really help you there.
>
> Given that the bug was only present for a day or so, two separate bug 
> reports on pages with large tables being sorted indicates that they 
> have to be somewhat common.  Unless you think that there were just the 
> two of them and people happened to stumble on them, out of all the 
> pages out there, in that one day?
Without more information I can't say. A likely scenario would be a
web-developer looking at pages on an intranet which is why he shows you
a reduced example. It doesn't necessarily reflect the open web at all,
especially as you aren't pointing to any real examples.
>
> If one can spider for such things easily, one could look for pages 
> including jquery.tablesorter.min.js, of course, and see what they look 
> like.
>
> But I'm not really sure what the question is here.  I'm not claiming 
> that a large percentage of the web has large tables being sorted.  
> Just that at least two people who happened to be using the latest 
> Firefox nightly ran into such pages without 24 hours and actually 
> reported a bug based on that...
Actually, you said "that all sorts of pages out there sort
multi-thousand-row tables by reordering the row nodes in the DOM. "
Are you now saying that based on two examples, one of them 500 rows and
one anecdotal, we can probably assume it is that way?
Received on Friday, 26 June 2009 06:57:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:14:00 GMT