W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: Optional method arguments in the DOM

From: Emrah BASKAYA <emrahbaskaya@hesido.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 01:31:16 +0300
To: "Garrett Smith" <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>, "DOM mailing list" <www-dom@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.ta7kueb08nstxa@lomarnona>

On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:32:43 +0300, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>  
wrote:

>
> I actually like this idea.
>
> For example:
> scrollIntoView( [bShowAtTop] )
>
> hypothetical
>
> b.cloneNode() // equivalent to b.cloneNode( false );
>
>

Am I wrong to think, that this new approach is not good for existing  
methods, but is good only for new methods that will defined in feature?  
Because such new scripts utilizing this feature will not be backwards  
compatible..



-- 
Emrah BASKAYA
www.hesido.com
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2006 22:31:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:40:09 UTC