On Dec 24, 2005, at 3:43 AM, Ray Whitmer wrote: > > > On Dec 23, 2005, at 10:47 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > >> Ray Whitmer wrote: >>> I think there is no mention of being able to skip the event if >>> the replacement is a replacement with the current value. >> >> Except then no modification happened, so it makes no sense to fire >> a modification event... This is assuming we mean string >> replacement, not replacement of one Attr node with another. > > Yes, you are correct in this case. In the case of the attribute > modified, if there was no effective change of the string > replacement, there is no event. I was confusing the rules of this > event with those of node insertion / removal. I intended to say node insertion / removal during a node self- replacement operation. Ray WhitmerReceived on Saturday, 24 December 2005 11:11:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:58 GMT