On Dec 1, 2005, at 6:34 AM, Ray Whitmer wrote: > > Can you tell me how many implementers of the standard would be made > retroactively incompatible by this sort of change to an intentional > part of DOM Level 1? I am not talking the major vendors current > implementations, but other and prior implementatiions? Please > enumerate those which will not be broken and let's see how many you > leave out. It is perhaps not as relevant to me as you would like it > to be that you personally do not care about these other > implementations which followed the standard. I have know list but > know of enough. Making either empty string or null an acceptable return value in this case will break 0 implementations. Can you name any that would be broken by making both behaviors conforming? I can't imagine how this is possible. Regards, MaciejReceived on Friday, 2 December 2005 07:17:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2007 00:17:18 GMT