W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 2005


From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:03:03 -0500
Message-ID: <438EF487.9010607@metalab.unc.edu>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: DOM mailing list <www-dom@w3.org>, vicki Murley <vicki@apple.com>, andersca@mac.com

Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> I'd like to request an erratum to make raising this exception optional. 
> There does not seem to be much benefit to requiring DOM implementations 
> to enforce this limit.

This is a major change, not a minor erratum. It would impact a lot of 
existing non-browser DOM implementations. It is also unnecessary in DOM 
level 3 where there are methods to import/adopt nodes into new documents.

While I tend to think that there probably shouldn't have been such a 
restriction in DOM level 1 in the first place, I object to changing it 
now via an erratum. This level of change requires a new version of DOM, 
and in fact such a version already exists. There's no need to rewrite 
history here.

´╗┐Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 13:03:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:12 UTC