W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Stray mention of Entity in definitions of 'entities'

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:20:41 -0500
To: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
Cc: WWW DOM <www-dom@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1077834041.13918.47.camel@jfouffa.w3.org>
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 16:41, Curt Arnold wrote:
>  From  
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PR-DOM-Level-3-Core-20040205/core#parameter-
> entities
> > Only  EntityReference nodes to non-defined entities are kept in the  
> > document, with their  associated Entity nodes if any.
> The phrase "with their associated Entity nodes if any" is a hold-over  
> from the previous definition of "entities" and should be eliminated.

+1. In fact, it should talk about unexpanded entity references, as
defined in the Infoset, instead of entity references to non-defined


Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 17:20:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:57 GMT