- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:53:38 -0500
- To: Andrew Clover <and-w3@doxdesk.com>
- Cc: WWW DOM <www-dom@w3.org>
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 17:53, Andrew Clover wrote: > Fully agree, but I'd expect such a reliance situation to occur more readily > with the exceptions-swallowed model than the exceptions-propagated model - it > is possible a faulty filter throwing exceptions would go entirely unnoticed. We reconsidered our change and change the specification as follows for DataUserHandler, LSParserFilter, and LSSerializerFilter: [[ DOM applications must not raised exceptions in a filter. The effect of throwing exceptions from a filter is DOM implementation dependent. ] (modulo, for the data handler, s/filter/data handler/) Let us know if this satisfy your original comment. > Oh, and I'd like to Ack-Agreement issues andrew1-andrew4 also. Cheers! Thanks, this helps a lot when going to the Director, Philippe
Received on Friday, 9 January 2004 11:53:47 UTC