- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: 28 Aug 2003 16:16:57 -0400
- To: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
- Cc: WWW DOM <www-dom@w3.org>
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 00:59, Curt Arnold wrote: > Having attributes that allow you to readily determine if the type is > complex vs simple or named vs anonymous would seem to be helpful. Such as: > > readonly attribute boolean isSimple; > readonly attribute boolean isAnonymous; (may be redundant with typeName > == null) This request goes into the debate of how much of the PSVI API should be included on this interface. We judge this one to be a real PSVI addition than a type generic one. > XML Schema Datatypes has equivalents for the DTD attribute types which > could be used instead of null and attribute type property. The current > definition would not provide an easy way to distinguish between: An application can always know the schema apply to the document by checking the schema-type parameter of the configuration object, so there is a way to distinguish them. Philippe
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2003 16:17:32 UTC