W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > July to September 2003

Re: Last Call comments on DOM 3 Core Specification

From: Christian Parpart <cparpart@surakware.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:13:15 +0200
To: www-dom@w3.org
Message-Id: <200307310041.11852.cparpart@surakware.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 30 July 2003 9:58 pm, Anjana Manian wrote:
> 4. Interface NameList:
>
> This interface too can be moved to Validation spec as it is used only in
> Validation spec.

But it may be used by the application coder even if he doesn't use the
Validation module.

> 7. Interface Text :
>
> "If the Text node is a direct child of the Document node, ..."
> -  Document can have only Element, ProcessingInstruction, Comment,
> DocumentType. So a text node can not be a direct child of the Document
> node.

I believe the only good usecase for having Text nodes beeing a direct child of
Document is, that you can reproduce the original document structure.
These Text nodes shall contain of course ONLY whitespaces (#9, #10, #12).

Greets,
Christian Parpart.

- --
 23:09:26 up 71 days, 14:15,  0 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.06, 0.07
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/LlvtPpa2GmDVhK0RAjdQAJ9KjKHE9MRfwR4gA+L6fbsmnAy/vgCdHi5+
D+xZxDMViOuCpUKkP/zvxMQ=
=UsuR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 4 August 2003 09:20:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:57 GMT