Re: [Fwd: FW: DOM 3 Validation: Separation of features]

Benjamin C. Chang wrote:

>
>We decided to not divide into 3 feature areas as you suggest, since we
>thought the current implementation was fine as-is.  Implementors
>who wish to implement a subset may be free to do so, but we think
>the entire set of functionality is straightforward to implement and
>should not take that much time to do so.
>...
>  
>
> See our previous response about the proposed feature division.
>
>Doc was added for the various exceptions on setting of the
>continuousValidityChecking attribute.
>...
>  
>
> We decided to omit the RangeEditVAL interface for now since
>
>the two Validation implementations currently being done were not
>going to implement it and there weren't many "customers" asking
>for these.
>...
>  
>
>Yes, this was changed to "Validation".
>  
>
I am satisified with the proposed resolutions to these issues.