W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: DOM3 Validation: External grammars

From: Benjamin C. Chang <Ben.Chang@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 15:22:35 -0700
Message-ID: <3ED3E52B.EC4EB5AF@oracle.com>
To: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
CC: www-dom@w3.org, w3c-dom-wg@w3.org

We decided to not add the requested functionality.   There are
different ways to determine what schema is associated with the
document, e.g., DOM L3 CORE schemaTypeInfo, but since there
is no standard mechanism to bind schemas to documents, we will
not be the ones to specify such a standard or to indicate how to attach
such schemas to documents.

If schema location were modified or removed, behavior would be
implementation dependent.


Curt Arnold wrote:

> There does not seem to be any provision for the caller to specify a
> specific grammar for validation.  Validation depends on the document
> containing a document type declaration, a xsi:schemaLocation or equivalent.
> A grammar attribute of type Node on DocumentEditVAL could be used to
> specify the external grammar (also potentially determine default
> grammars located by xsi:schemaLocation attributes, though that might be
> add more complication than it is valuable).  DTD's could be associated
> by loading a template document and setting DocumentEditVAL.grammer to
> the DocumentType node of the template document.  Schemas could be
> associated by setting grammer to an Element or Document node containing
> a single schema.  Schema collections could be represented by a
> DocumentFragment containing multiple xs:schema elements.
> validateDocument() would also need a grammar parameter.
> The working draft does not discuss the behavior if a schema location
> hint is modified or removed.  Would removing a xsi:schemaLocation
> attribute on the document element allow you to change the document at will?
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2003 18:24:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:11 UTC