Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 12:12, Robin Berjon wrote: >>Yes, that would indeed be great, especially as none of the alternative are any >>good (casting, proprietary, reinventing the wheel). The splitting out would seem >>to require minimal work and could be readily reused by other specs. > > I have no objection of doing so and we could certainly add it on our > wishes list: > http://www.w3.org/2001/10/23-DOMOpenList That would be nice. > ... but that would require that the Working Group do produce work on a > general "browser" interface, which we don't for the moment. Our current > plans are to finish DOM Level 3 (which is really late on schedule) for > the moment but, for the moment, we don't plan to produce more work after > that. Couldn't another WG take care of that? The DOM WG isn't the only one that deals with user agents. -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr> Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 05:41:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2007 00:17:15 GMT