At 12:35 PM 12/19/2002 -0500, TonyT wrote: >I understand this better now, thanks. > >. It was already proposed as Views and Formatting spec in the DOM >> section at W3C.org. But they had proposed a new abstract model where you can >> ask questions about entities which do not exist in markup, such as >> characters. I argued that instead best to expose rendered values of the 1:1 corresponding >> properties of markeup else the logic below applies... > > >I forsee such an abstract model opening the door to browser security issues, >or possibly conflicting w/ existing security precautions/methodology used by >browser. It seems that this type of model would have to be specially >sandboxed? Interesting point. I do not visual the security vulnerability, but that is a point. When you add a new layer, you have to rethink the security ramifications. I have cc: the mailing list. -Shelby MooreReceived on Thursday, 19 December 2002 12:43:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 May 2007 00:17:15 GMT