W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2002

Re: Node::prefix modification

From: Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:58:14 -0500
To: "Www-Dom@W3.Org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF88EA73E6.1DCD9E5E-ON85256B5D.007D047C@pok.ibm.com>

Good question. Although the description of nodeValue explicitly says that
setting it is a no-op for nodes which can't have values, prefix doesn't
explicitly state what happens.

The "... this is always null" wording, without elaboration, generally does
mean the DOM WG's intent was that setting it would be a silent no-op.

But this is worth nailing down explicitly, and I don't see an already
existing erratum on this topic.

______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Received on Monday, 11 February 2002 17:58:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:55 GMT