>In order to be DOM-compliant, are prevValueArg, newValueArg and attrNameArg >required to be non-null for those MutationEvent types for which they apply? Yes. >It seems like supporting this requirement for prevValue could degrade >overall UA performance In general mutation events are a performance challenge simply because they're so pervasive and uncontrolled. You can do some things with partially deferred computation, or with suppressing events unless there are active listeners; I believe Xerces' implementation demonstrates a few simple ideas along those lines. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM ResearchReceived on Tuesday, 14 May 2002 15:51:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:55 GMT