W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: FW: readonly nodes

From: Rahul Srivastava <Rahul.Srivastava@Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:53:34 +0000 (Asia/Calcutta)
Message-Id: <200204170931.g3H9VIF19872@blr-root.India.Sun.COM>
To: www-dom@w3.org
Cc: Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com, Amit.Handa@Sun.COM
> Arnold, Curt wrote...
> Basically, the WG decided that the explicit statement that setting a
> nodeValue has no effect when nodeValue is defined to be null took precedence
> over throwing an exception when the node is readonly.

As of today DOM L1 SE, L2, L3 say:
"The value of this node, depending on its type; see the table above. When it is 
definied to be null, setting it has no effect".

But no one, neither errata says that no effect takes precedence over throwing 

Is the precedence clause going to be in DOM L1 SE, L2 errata and L3?

Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 05:31:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:10 UTC