> it is called "node" (see INVALID_NODE_TYPE_ERR and > HIERARCHY_REQUEST_ERR). Agreed. newParent is clearly what was intended. I'd say we should accept that one as an editorial erratum. (If we hadn't marked "node" as being a keyword, I'd be tempted to claim this was just a sloppy phrasing of "the argument node" and let it go as suboptimal-but-harmless. But if we did that we should fix the markup... and if we're going to edit it at all, we should fix it properly.) ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM ResearchReceived on Friday, 17 August 2001 10:25:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:49 GMT