Yes, I see my confusion now. We send a complete object and we may get one back. Thank You, Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Kesselman" <keshlam@us.ibm.com> To: "Joe D Willliams" <JOEDWIL@earthlink.net> Cc: <www-dom@w3.org> Sent: January 25, 2001 6:29 AM Subject: Re: setNamedItemNS(namespaceURI, localName) > > It looks like someone is confusing this setter method > Node setNamedItemNS(in Node arg) > raises(DOMException); > with its corresponding getter: > Node getNamedItemNS(in DOMString namespaceURI, in DOMString > localName); > > Note that the arguments are different. In the setter, we're inserting a > particular Node, and using that node's name -- which is a two-part value > made up of its localname and its namespaceURI, as stored in the node > itself. In the getter, we're specifying that two-part name and expect the > matching node (if any) to be returned. > > >Received on Thursday, 25 January 2001 11:48:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:24:52 GMT