- From: Patrick Schmitz <pschmitz@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 16:06:10 -0800
- To: "'keshlam@us.ibm.com'" <keshlam@us.ibm.com>, www-dom@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: keshlam@us.ibm.com [mailto:keshlam@us.ibm.com] ... > > It might be appropriate to encourage folks to manage the > event-name space > as URIs or via reversed-domain-name prefixes or something of > that sort, to > reduce the risk of collision. In many cases, we expect authors to define events that are associated with specific media and documents; they may not want the overhead of such a naming scheme. I see your point, and folks are free to take that approach where it may make sense, but I am not keen to require (or even encourage) namespace qualified event names. Patrick Schmitz Program Manager - Web Multimedia Standards Microsoft
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2000 19:07:16 UTC