W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Older Sibling?

From: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 14:21:16 -0500
cc: www-dom@w3.org
Message-ID: <85256895.006A51A7.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>
> L2 _is_ going to be very clear about how folk other than W3C
> can define new feature identifiers to pass to Node.hasFeature()
> isn't it?

There's language in L2's description of hasFeature that addresses this.

We might want to tweak that wording slightly. It currently says "The legal
values are defined throughout this specification and listed in the
Compliance section." I suspect that we meant to say "The values used by the
DOM Specification". We should also probably be more explicit about the fact
that names without periods (ie, without prefixes) are reserved for use by
the DOM spec.



______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2000 14:21:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:47 GMT