W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: Another Java Language Binding Question

From: Gita Vij-Solanki <Gita@Interoute.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:06:41 -0000
Message-ID: <9F36893EFAA7D311A7C100508B1178A805C901@ukportnts001.port.interoute.com>
To: "'Arnaud Le Hors'" <lehors@us.ibm.com>, www-dom@w3.org
take me off this list

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Arnaud Le Hors [SMTP:lehors@us.ibm.com]
> Sent:	27 January 2000 22:33
> To:	www-dom@w3.org
> Subject:	Re: Another Java Language Binding Question
> 
> I don't know what you mean by "artificially", but the reason it is
> abstract is that it's the closest we could get to an interface. Ideally
> the DOM java binding would only define interfaces. This is unfortunately
> impossible due to the way Java defines exceptions.
> -- 
> Arnaud  Le Hors - IBM Cupertino, XML Technology Group
> 
> 
This Email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
It may also contain confidential and privileged material. Any review,
re-transmission, dissemination or action taken in reliance upon it, or any
other use of this information by persons, or entities, other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this Email in error
please contact the sender and delete it. 
Received on Friday, 28 January 2000 05:06:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 June 2012 06:13:47 GMT