W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 1998


From: Stephen R. Savitzky <steve@rsv.ricoh.com>
Date: 03 Nov 1998 12:11:07 -0800
To: keshlam@us.ibm.com
Cc: www-dom@w3.org
Message-ID: <qcr9vkr0ys.fsf@gelion.crc.ricoh.com>
keshlam@us.ibm.com writes:

> >either it is being traversed or it is being edited, but not both at once
> Apologies for the shorthand. Obviously accessors would have to be held off
> while edits are in progress and vice versa (at least when they're in the
> same area of the DOM tree), as well as edits versus edits. The trick is
> reducing the granularity of locking, and trying to allow simultaneous
> non-editing access, so performance impacts are minimized.

There is no way to make locking local in the presence of live NodeLists and
of iterators that are ``robust'' over arbitrary changes in the tree.

I would like to see _some_ variant of the DOM that does _not_ require
locking, caching, lazy evaluation, and all the other machinery that is
required by Level 1.

To put it another way, I would like to see a specification that specifies
the INTERFACES, BUT NOT THE BEHAVIOR, because it doesn't seem possible for
the people developing the DOM to avoid specifying behaviors that have
massive non-local effects that render it all but impossible to implement
correctly, and totally impossible to implement efficiently.

 Stephen R. Savitzky   Chief Software Scientist, Ricoh Silicon Valley, Inc., 
<steve@rsv.ricoh.com>                            California Research Center
 voice: 650.496.5710   fax: 650.854.8740    URL: http://rsv.ricoh.com/~steve/
  home: <steve@starport.com> URL: http://www.starport.com/people/steve/
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 1998 15:05:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:05 UTC