W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > July to September 1998

Re: Should Document.cloneNode() work in Level 1?

From: Don Park <donpark@quake.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 01:59:26 -0700
Message-ID: <000d01bddbd0$2de254d0$2ee044c6@arcot-main>
To: <www-dom@w3.org>

>The problem with transferNode below is that it assumes that
>the destination node can change the ownerDocument for the
>node, which currently isn't possible between implementations.

Yeah, I realized my forgetfulness right after posting it.  This basically
forces transferNode implementation to always move by copying the content.

However, your suggestion also forces cloning.  The question is, are there
any way to do this without cloning?  Just change the definition of

Received on Wednesday, 9 September 1998 05:08:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:04 UTC