- From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@eps.inso.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1998 14:31:39 -0700
- To: "DOM List" <www-dom@w3.org>
A message I meant to send to the entire list... -----Original Message----- From: anoq@vip.cybercity.dk [mailto:anoq@vip.cybercity.dk] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 1998 11:13 AM To: gtn Subject: Re: To wstring or not to wstring... Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote: > For the purposes of the DOM, you should consider a wstring to be > a > > typedef sequence<unsigned short> wstring > > and I think we even said this in one version of the spec. OK, I have seen this... I just thought it was temporary, because your compiler / whatever didn't have wstrings yet (omniORB doesn't either...) > I was planning > to have this automatically generated in the IDL binding (which I am in > the process of cleaning up so that omniORB will handle the DOM IDL > correctly). Perhaps we should define this as DOMString instead? At least not wstring, since this is a reserved IDL word... Should this also go to the DOM-list? :) Cheers -- , ANOQ of the Sun / Johnny Andersen E-Mail: anoq@vip.cybercity.dk or anoq@berlin-consortium.org Homepage: http://users.cybercity.dk/~ccc25861/
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 1998 14:31:53 UTC