W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 1997

Re: Comments about the Java DOM interfaces

From: Laurent ROUVET <rouvet@cnam.fr>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 20:17:25 +0100
Message-ID: <34A402C5.C9FC198B@cnam.fr>
To: "Mark L. Fussell" <mark.fussell@chimu.com>, www-dom@w3.org
Mark L. Fussell wrote:
> The following are some comments on the Java DOM interfaces and some
> [...]
> OccurrenceType should be an interface and not a class.  Otherwise you

Could you indicate what's your reference document ?
I use the DOM level-one-971009 and I didn't find "OccurrenceType".
Thank you for your help. :-)
> All the inner classes should have 'static' in front of the 'class' as

idem. I don't find classes and even less the inner classes.

> [...] 
> Larger/Less-likely Functionality Suggestions
> --------------------------------------------
> There seems to be a number of inconsistencies between the DOM and the
> Grove model.  It would seem these two should be more fully aligned.

I agree.


Laurent ROUVET.
Received on Monday, 29 December 1997 17:28:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:03 UTC