W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > July 2002

Re: HTMLTableElement31.xml

From: Rick Rivello <richard.rivello@nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 14:16:18 -0400
Message-ID: <071701c22774$b8cd5830$573b0681@sdct.nist.gov>
To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@aspentech.com>, <www-dom-ts@w3.org>

It is not in the original L1 spec but
is in L1(Second Edition).

I previously asked this question to
the mailing list but did not receive
and answer about items in the
L1(Second Edition).

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom-ts/2002Jul/0001.html
 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@aspentech.com>
To: "'Rick Rivello'" <richard.rivello@nist.gov>
Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:11 PM
Subject: RE: HTMLTableElement31.xml


> Totally empty <TABLE> elements are not valid HTML or XHTML since the DTD's
> requires at least one TBODY or TR to appear in the content model of a TABLE.
> I believe that was the motivation of my changing the test document to not
> have empty tables which had the side effect of compromising the motivation
> of this test.
> 
> Creating and adding a table element through the DOM as the test apparently
> does appears to be the best way to test that passage without requiring
> implementations to accept invalid documents.
> 
> Is the passage you quoted in both L1 and L2 HTML?
> 
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 14:16:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:58:46 GMT