W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > January 2002

Re: [Release] Countdown

From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:45:55 +0100
Cc: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
Message-Id: <7DB0E6F7-09F0-11D6-BD98-000393556882@ontologicon.com>
Were you thinking os something more official than announcing the review 
period on this list when you mentioned the last call window?

If so, we should fomralize. I think most people in charge of DOM-related 
QA know about this list and are subscribers to it, so I think that 
should be enough. If anyone thinks otherwise, please advise.

Any news on the HTML issue? i know that people at Netscape have 
successfully built the level 1 suite.

/Dimitris

On Thursday, January 10, 2002, at 07:10 , Arnold, Curt wrote:

> I'd like to see a summary of the test results from Oracle's Java Parser 
> and
> GNUJAXP and update the Mozilla test results and review all the reports 
> one
> last time.
>
> I think that we should have a last call window to give the implementors 
> one
> last look before we "release" the suite.
>
> There was a contention from David Brownell that the recommendation did 
> not
> require an implementation to populate the child nodes of a entity 
> reference
> that was created with Document.CreateEntityReference (failure to do so 
> would
> fail the *EE tests plus one or two others).  However, his justification 
> was
> based on non-public WG discussions and not on anything in the
> recommendation.  I do not believe that that issue has been adequately
> resolved by a statement from the WG.
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2002 14:45:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:58:45 GMT