- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:15:47 +0100
- To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
- Cc: www-dom-ts@w3.org
> > >> 3. We are working on a web-based harness for the ECMA tests (and it >> looks as if we'll drop Junit at some point, given Bob's work) > > Did you mean JUnit or JSUnit. Dropping JUnit would be a bad thing since > using a standard testing framework makes it easier for the DOM tests to > get > integrated into the standard build process of implementations. > Requiring a > custom testing framework hinders use of the tests. > > Having a custom runner for browser-based testing is beneficial, however > I'd > still like the tests to be runnable both with JSUnit and the custom > browser > runner. > > I obviously mean JsUnit, that was a typo. If possible, we should use the JsUnit framework, especially since Edward has been helping out in incorporating improvements; if the changes we propose are not consinstent with the framework we may have to drop it, though.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2002 05:14:41 UTC