Re: Automated dist process (was: My stab at a distribution)

Forgot to mention that on comparing the file names in the distribution 
with the actual contents of build/level1/core/ecmascript/tests, the 
latter contains correct file names and no duplicates.


On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 02:27 , Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote:

> I very much like the idea of automating the distribution process. 
> However, we need to prioritize the release, at least for this 
> iteration, and given that there are a series of things introduced by 
> Curt's latest work (filenames, etc) I propose to focus on releasing a 
> stable version of the TS and concentrate on finalizing the details of 
> the latest commits later (which I will certainly help in doing)
>
> Among those are:
>
> 1. Patches for JsUnit as opposed to an official release. I presume this 
> will be taken care of once JsUnit reaches 1.2.7.
> 2. index.htm on the CVS. I don't see the point for this, except if we 
> manage to automate title, date creation (releases will vary as to when 
> they are released) and other things to make it relevant for the 
> particular distribution created
> 3. As indicated in a previous email, filenames are garbled in the 
> ecmascript directory
> 4. Pictures, stylesheets, scripts, licenses and so forth; if they are 
> to be included in every distribution, fair enough. Otherwise they 
> should be taken out of the CVS.
>
> And as a general remark, I think we need to to a CVS cleanup, there's 
> still files that have caused problems as well as unused directories 
> (files/ for example) as well as move _all_ of the patch, sed and 
> doxygen files into a separate directory.
>
> /Dimitris
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 08:54:34 UTC