W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > February 2002

Re: [Release] Final round

From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:36:27 +0100
Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
To: "Curt Arnold" <carnold@houston.rr.com>
Message-Id: <3903B460-1F8B-11D6-9D3C-000393556882@ontologicon.com>
OK, if you think it's only going to add a few hours, that's OK. In case 
it would add significantly more, however, we could think in terms of 
splitting the release, especially as it was one of the alternatives 
discussed earlier.

If I'm the only one thinking that, though, we'll obviously go for the 
full version.

On Tuesday, February 12, 2002, at 05:28 , Curt Arnold wrote:

> I'd think we shouldn't split the release just to move it up a day.  I 
> don't
> know what time zone Edward is in, but I got a flurry of messages about 
> this
> time yesterday.  So I'm thinking, he will probably have this morning's
> changes in a release in a few hours or so.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
> To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
> Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [Release] Final round
>> On second thought, paying respect to the fact that E. Hieatt has indeed
>> been responsive and Curt has invested lots of time into the JsUnit
>> issue, we may want to consider releasing the Java part of the TS now
>> (since we have no issues with it, as far as I can see) and allow for
>> some more time in order to release a proper ECMA TS. I think this is 
>> the
>> safest way to go about.
>> People's views?
>> If so, tomorrow mid-day is not to soon, given that we release Java 
>> only.
>> /Dimitris
>> On Monday, February 11, 2002, at 08:35 , Arnold, Curt wrote:
>>> Edward Hieatt has been very responsive and if the patch that I 
>>> submitted
>>> this morning passes his review, I would expect that he would update
>>> JSUnit
>>> very quickly.  However, I think that tomorrow mid-day might be to soon
>>> to
>>> expect an updated JSUnit and I would prefer not to include a JSUnit 
>>> that
>>> does not correspond to a released version.
>>> The version numbers are explictly written in the manifest files along
>>> with
>>> copyright and other information.  I would appreciate someone else
>>> updating
>>> them appropriately.  They are not part of the transform but are in the
>>> java
>>> subdirectory (java/dom1-core.mf and java/junit/junit-run.mf, if memory
>>> serves).
>>> Are you building the distributable with Ant?  There should be a task
>>> like
>>> dom1-core-dist that would build everything repeatably.
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2002 02:35:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:04 UTC