W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Running HTML L2 with Mozilla 0.9.9 and later

From: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:25:28 -0500
Message-ID: <007701c1df43$e84148c0$a800a8c0@CurtMicron>
To: "Rick Rivello" <richard.rivello@nist.gov>
Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
> Curt can I also take the same approach with the html_alltests.html file
> so that I can run the tests on IE?

I'm not sure what is going on when you are running the tests on IE.

> Here are the results
>
> 3.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLAppletElement05
> failed
>
> "codeBaseLink"
> Expected ./files/ (string) but was
http://xw2k.sdct.itl.nist.gov/brady/dom/files/ (string)

I believe both IE and Mozilla return absolute URI's for the
HTMLApplet.codebase attribute.  The text doesn't explicitly prohibit or
require returning an absolute URI.

I added an <assertURIEquals> element into the DOM TS language for such a
case, but I don't believe that is has been used yet and not sure if the
supporting code is implemented.

>
> 10.
>
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLButtonElement01
> failed
>
> "formLink"
> Expected form2 (string) but was  (string)

HTMLFormElement.name does not specify what connection this property accessor
has with the [X]HTML content.  <form> does not have a name attribute
defined.  The test expects that value of the id attribute to be returned.

>
> 15.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLElement01
> failed
>
> "idLink"
> Expected Test-HEAD (string) but was  (string)
>
> 16.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLElement30
> failed
>
> "titleLink"
> Expected HEAD Element (string) but was  (string)
>
> 17.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLElement59
> failed
>
> "langLink"
> Expected en (string) but was  (string)
>
> 18.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLElement88
> failed
>
> "dirLink"
> Expected ltr (string) but was  (string)
>
> 19.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLElement117
> failed
>
> "classNameLink"
> Expected HEAD-class (string) but was  (string)


All tests look like a problem with the class created for the <head> element
in the implementation.  Similar tests on other elements seem to work fine.

> 21.
>
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLFieldSetElement01
> failed
>
> "formLink"
> Expected form2 (string) but was  (string)

Same issue as test 10

>
> 24.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLFormElement03
> failed
>
> "nameLink"
> Expected form1 (string) but was  (string)

Same issue as test 10

>
> 29.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLHtmlElement01
> failed
>
> "versionLink"
> Expected transitional 4.0 (string) but was transitional xhtml 1.0 (string)

The content of the version attribute of the html element differ between
html.html and html.xml.  Would be better if html.html and html.xml both
contained the same version attribute.


>
> 32.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLInputElement08
> failed
>
> "checkedLink"
> Call to assertTrue(boolean) with false

Looks like an implementation bug.  "checked" is the only legal value for the
checked attribute in XHTML 1.0's DTD.  I assume that the implementation
didn't check for that value and just passed the attribute value to a boolean
conversion routine.

>
> 34.
>
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLIsIndexElement01
> had an error
>
> Error message is:
> "TypeError: fNode has no properties"

Looks like an implementation problem, but if fixed would run into the issue
from test #10.

>
> 39.
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLLinkElement01
> failed
>
> "disabledLink"
> Call to assertTrue(boolean) with false

Looks like similar implementation problem to test #32

>
> 58.
>
file:///C:/cygwin/home/Administrator/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/build/level2/html/e
cmascript/tests/alltests.html:testHTMLTableRowElement07
> failed
>
> "bgColorLink"
> Expected #00FFFF (string) but was #00ffff (string)

The corresponding .xml document isn't valid XHTML as the bgcolor element has
been deprecated.  The HTML DOM spec isn't clear if the bgcolor should
reflect the color as implied by a stylesheet or only an explicit bgcolor
attribute.

It would be good if you could test the test documents against the W3C XHTML
and HTML validation service.  Got to run.
Received on Monday, 8 April 2002 17:26:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:58:46 GMT