W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > September 2001

RE: [Action Items] Top priority (Revision period, ECMA transform, Harness, Packaging)

From: Harri Porten <porten@trolltech.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:59:52 -0400 (EDT)
To: www-dom-ts@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10108311954200.5496-100000@lupinella.troll.no>
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Jason Brittsan wrote:

> I've reviewed many of the ECMAScript files you mentioned... I don't see
> any glaring problems that would prevent them from running in any
> environment, but it's very difficult to be sure without running each
> one.
>  
> I'm not aware of any tools that check ECMAScript syntax outside of the
> browser, but if I come across one, I'll inform the list.

I've written a small, portable C++ parser that can be run standalone and
has a checkSyntax() method. It's just that the information in case of an
error is not too sophisticated (position, expected token). Tell me if I
should make a package available.

Harri.
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2001 13:34:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:58:44 GMT