>If a developer is testing their implementation, they will be required to >run every test every time. Allowing developers to test small portions >of their implementation is a much more efficient use of time. As long as the test harness provides _some_ configurable mechanism for selecting which tests do and don't run, your needs would seem to be addressed. Whether than mechanism is exclusion lists to block everything you're currently uninterested in, or predefined groups, or some other form of magic doesn't seem to make much practical difference...? ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM ResearchReceived on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 16:14:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:58:45 GMT