W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > November 2001

Re: DOM WG F2F Demo and reactions

From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 22:02:57 +0100
Message-Id: <200111192103.fAJL3tU11698@mail.24-7webhosting.com>
Cc: "'www-dom-ts@w3.org'" <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
Thanks for clarifying this.

The idea was that we should provice information on each test to indicate 
version of TS, in order for implementors to monitor incrementally higher 
degree of support. Since we already operate with the concept of version, 
I don't think it's a problem.

However, for conflicting tests, we definitely take away any old test 
that conflicts with a new moderated one. This is in part what I thought 
the versions would indicate.


On Monday, November 19, 2001, at 05:33  PM, Arnold, Curt wrote:

>> 4. Provide dates or version numbers on the tests so that it's easier
>> to extract information from running the different versions of the
>> tests without having to refer to the version number of the suite as
>> such. Can we have another round of packaging and versioning issues on
>> the list?
> After "release", there should be no non-cosmetic changes to a test.  If
> there is a change that could potentially change the results of the 
> test, a
> new test should be created and the previous test, if invalid, should be
> deprecated.
Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 16:05:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:03 UTC