- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:53:20 -0800
- To: Curt Arnold <carnold@houston.rr.com>, www-dom-ts@w3.org
> If the > ultimate correct answer is 2, then the test should be changed to require > exactly 2 elements in the node list. > > I would agree that your interpretation of the recommendation text is > reasonable and possibly what the WG was trying to say, but if all (or almost > all) the implementations read it a different way, then I would suggest an > errata to ratify the defacto behavior. That's pretty much what I said ... either the spec has a bug, or some implementations do. I think it's the implementations, but the question does need to get answered. Ratifying random bugs is a dangerous route. How does the DOM WG get involved when such issues get raised? > If you could pass along some quick notes on using Saxon with Ant, I'd be > grateful. All I did was run ANT 1.4.1 (current) in an environment that's set up to default to using the current GNUJAXP code (SAX and DOM) and Saxon 6.4.2; I've no idea if more recent versions of Saxon would behave differently. The build ran fine, modulo out-of-memory problems caused by having too much other stuff going on at the same time. - Dave
Received on Saturday, 17 November 2001 19:20:37 UTC