- From: Jeroen van Rotterdam <jeroen@x-hive.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 18:34:15 +0200
- To: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
- Cc: "Dimitris Dimitriadis" <dimitris.dimitriadis@improve.se>
> 3. we can point to the right part of the spec, since the spec generated
the
> test
>
> However, we need to have more granularity in the DOM Specification format,
> which is being looked into.
The generation of the DTD or Schema for the testsuite is what Freek means
not the test itself.
I believe al the info is already available within the XML source of the DOM
Specs.
Take a look at f.i. the fragment of the LS spec (included below) turning
that into:
<!ELEMENT parseCMURI EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST parseCMURI
obj CDATA #REQUIRED
var CDATA #REQUIRED
uri CDATA #REQUIRED
>
wouldn't be hard I think..
Jeroen
- <method name="parseCMURI" id="ID-LS-DOMBuilder-parseCMURI">
<parameters>
- <param name="uri" type="DOMString" attr="in">...</param>
</parameters>
- <returns type="CMModel">... </returns>
- <raises>
......
</raises>
- </method>
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2001 12:30:26 UTC