W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > June 2001

Re: [General] domconftest now a project at SourceForge

From: Mary Brady <mbrady@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:09:17 -0400
Message-ID: <00a301c0fffd$72a88770$293b0681@HAPPY>
To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>, "Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@acm.org>
Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@acm.org>
To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
Cc: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: [General] domconftest now a project at SourceForge


>
> Arnold, Curt writes:
>  > I guess we should spend some time on what the CVS should look like
since
>  > it is impossible to undo changes without leaving a trace.
>
>   Not impossible, but difficult, tedious, and highly undesirable.  ;)
>
>  > domconftest
>  >      tests
>  >      java
>  >          org
>  >             w3c
>  >                 dom
>  >                     testing
>  >      ecmascript
>  >      adapters
>  >         junit
>
>   Where do you envison documentation would go?  (Schema documentation,
> test framework documentation, etc.)
>   Also, this seems somewhat Java-centric.  Perhaps adapters/ should be
> inside the java/ directory, and then other languages would have a
> directory parallel to that?  Where do you expect things like the
> Python and ECMAScript components to go?  I'd at least expect the
> ECMAScript tests to be part of this repository since it plays an
> important role in the W3C specifications for the DOM.
>

[mb] Absolutely!  I agree that components for a particular binding should
be closely linked, and of course, documentation needs a prominent home -
somewhere close to the top.

--Mary

>
>   -Fred
>
> --
> Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
> PythonLabs at Digital Creations
>
>
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2001 14:11:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:58:44 GMT