W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom-ts@w3.org > July 2001

Re: nistmeta.xsl

From: Mary Brady <mbrady@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:17:35 -0400
Message-ID: <014801c10892$aa4b8d10$293b0681@HAPPY>
To: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>, "Joseph Kesselman" <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
Yes, I believe you are right, although the
name escapes me at the moment.  Was it
normalize?

--Mary

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Kesselman" <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
To: <www-dom-ts@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: nistmeta.xsl


>
> >if I remember correctly, there is at least one test where a
> >method moved from one interface to a different interface in level two...
>
> We worked pretty hard to make L2 downward-compatable with L1. If I
remember
> correctly, the API you're thinking of moved to a superclasss
> (superinterface?) of the original location, so the Level 1 test should
> still pass when run against a Level 2 DOM.
>
> ______________________________________
> Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
>
>
Received on Monday, 9 July 2001 12:19:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:34:03 UTC